Gilbert House Fellowship #230: Genesis 1:1-19

BACK TO the beginning! Today, we begin our study of the Old Testament for the second time, nearly five years after our very first dive into Genesis 1.

We discuss the meaning of various Hebrew words and their implications, and we explain why the first chapter of the Bible isn’t just a creation account, it’s a repudiation of the creation stories told by the cultures of the ancient world.


Join us this Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at Morningside in Blue Eye, Mo. We will be guests on upcoming episodes of The Jim Bakker Show and the recording session is free and open to the public. For more information, log on to www.JimBakkerShow.com.

Check the website for links to some of our favorite Bible study tools! And please, take advantage of  our free mobile app for iOS and Android. Links to the iTunes App Store and Google Play are on the main page at www.GilbertHouse.org.

Click here for the complete archive of our New Testament Bible studies to date, and click here for the Old Testament studies to date. Or go to www.spreaker.com/show/gilbert-house-fellowship for all of the audio.

34 Comments

Filed under Old Testament, Virtual Meetings

34 Responses to Gilbert House Fellowship #230: Genesis 1:1-19

  1. Pingback: Back to the Beginning – Weapon of Mass Distraction

  2. Lynn Shepard

    Thanks again for all the research you do for these fellowships! It was such a wonderful time with you in Israel!!

    • Betsy Bates

      I get excited to find others who understand all this-yeah!
      Just ordered your latest book Derek. I have always been that person in bible study that says that makes no sense, why would God do that…
      About 10 yrs ago after a car accident while recovering I got a Hebrew Greek lexicon and began to dig , after reading both M Heiser books the Bible made sense. I began doing exactly what your doing here. Thank you, I love to hear other opinions on things!

      I had one thing to say: After looking into this somewhat to me Genesis 1- In the beginning God created the heavens and earth -statement.
      Paraphrasing “ I had to destroy earth to stop evil , because all I create has freewill” the chose bad over good, now I’m re-creating it and I’m going to make this thing called man. In our “all present” image. We are like them but not them. So the actual destruction happens before he begins working. My opinion.

      I’m struggling with Genesis day 6 -for they were told to be hunters and gathers, work the land and populate the earth. While Adam was set aside as special in the garden of God and was given a perfect mate.

      Israel was created the same way. Always separate from the nations and hand picked raised separately from the others.

      Were there two sets of humans created then? The stories and order of things created do not match each other …

      It’s not a salvation issue, but it seems to be that way the more I research it.

      I’m catching up, my husband and I recently moved back to Houston from Dallas and haven’t found a church yet. Y’all are great and we are listening. I grew up with dachshund, I have a Great Dane now. We so appreciate y’all, thank you.

      Love to go on the trip in 2020, if the Antichrist hasn’t arose yet lol
      God bless and thanks again we talk back to y’all with agreements.
      Nodding we yes I agree!

      • Hi, Betsy: Thank you for your kind words! We don’t see how the Bible can support the idea that God created two sets of humans. Do you mean another group that was destroyed before the creation described in Genesis 1-2?

  3. Peggy Jenkins

    We know that Light Is measurable. Calculated as traveling from one point to another. Which then creates a measurable amount of time. It was evening and morning, the first day. Here’s the problem with a “gap” theory beyond what we know from scripture. Paul tells us that a day can be a thousand years and a thousand years can be a day therefore, the “gap” can NOT be longer than 1000 years. Just as it’s been 6000 +\- years since the fall of mankind, it can only stand to reason that creation itself could NOT have been longer than 7000 years.
    ~ my thoughts on the subject.
    P.S. I’m interested in hearing your thoughts on the reemerging flat earth theory as you continue this study in Genesis.

    • Larry Gilchrist

      Ok guys, 6 years from now when you do this again, and you are talking about the moon, you may want to bring up Mohammed and allah.

      • Hi, Larry: We will get to that. My new book is all about the spiritual forces behind Islam. I believe it’s more than just the moon-god. -Derek

        • Jonathan Overstreet

          I am currently reading this book, and about 70% through it, and like his previous books it is AWESOME!

          it might start a little “slow” as he sets up the scholarly basis, but it gets really hard to put down once he really gets going.

          • Jonathan Overstreet

            Seriously I do want to say, with all of Derik’s books I have read so far, if you struggle with the first few chapters, then really work at it because it is worth it like it is to ride a roller coaster, you work to climb, but then you find you are at the top of a crazy drop that will slowly roll over the top and then you find yourself on a wild and crazy ride that is the very reason you got on the ride itself.

            It is my opinion but all I have read from great inception till Bad Moon Rising has felt like this, I just need to do my diligence to read the scholarly set up and then BAM! huge pay off.

            Maybe I should say something extra…

            I read stuff Dr. Heiser puts in his special folder for subscribers.. they often have ancient languages in original text with no explanation, so that the following content you just have to trust, since we don’t read ancient Egyptian as an example. I also have read Physics publications with equations that you can forget having a clue on unless you are Einstein or Hawkins, yet you can still get the idea of the text…

            I think Derick does a really good job of translating the cryptic equations into our language, so you can at least read them, yet he leaves them in equation form, so you can process them with other ancient texts if your peer reviewing, so that a really good mix of scholar and laymen can learn something from these books.

      • Hoping we are raptured long before that

    • Jonathan Overstreet

      2 thoughts that may be pertinent:
      1: Dr. Heiser has done some posts showing that you really cannot argue for a gap theory as it is usually presented based on the hebrew.

      2: some really amazing science has passed peer review that touches on Gen. 1. The reference for the peer review publication that serves as a master review for all of them is, Cosmology and the Zero Point Energy. In it we find that the conclusion of over 300 years, thousands of independent labs, and trillions of points of data; give a near certainty that the universe is about 8100 years old, give or take a few decades. And this is by direct measurements and observations.

      Incidentally, if you are interested, it also talks about how galaxies, solar systems, and planets have been made in the lab in miniature. When you make a solar system, you get the odd order in Gen. 1 of the planet forming from water light and a sound wave, within the first 24 hours, a light source to make a day and night cycle, and then only a few days later does the Sun and population 1 stars form (sun and stars needed for constellations, plus enough light reflecting on the moon to be visible on earth).

      If you need data more lay friendly than peer review physics publications, go to Setterfield.org, everything is made available to a high school level there.

      • We love the work of Barry Setterfield. I was blessed to speak with him one night. He and his wife graciously sent us a packet of his work. Fascinating!

        • Jonathan Overstreet

          I know I am not him, and cannot earn essentially 4 PhD’s like him, but I have read everything I can find on his website and publications, so if you have a question, it is not impossible I could refer you to something deep in his website to look at.

          Also… I have listened to you and Sharon at about the same level… so maybe I am insane lol.

        • Jonathan Overstreet

          Since you responded… I am going to have to ask you this question that has been burning in me for a while that directly relates to your work and studies…

          Have you seen the Disney movie Coco?

          I watch it and I cannot NOT think about what you write about with the Amorite festival to their ancestors… should this inform us about theogeographgy or anything about the past movements of the gods?

          • We have not, but we will when it’s available to stream. (And if it is already, then we are remiss.) We’ve heard about it, and you’re right—that ancient ancestor veneration cult has never gone away.

  4. Walter Fisher

    I always enjoy listening to your podcasts. I hope all is well in Marionville. Everything is going well for me in Sioux Falls. Take care, and God bless! 🙂

  5. LaRene Mason

    Isaiah 55:11 Word of God does not return void. Thank you for sharing what He puts on your heart.

  6. Donald Campfield

    Dear Derek & Sharon,

    Thanks for discussing this passage—one which has sparked many different understandings of what its text is telling us. Because I know you love digging into the scriptures and because it’s been my personal privilege to know its authors, I wanted to leave you a link (I hope it posts correctly here!) to a book written by three Christian gentlemen who have both scientific and biblical exegesis training and worked out an amazing harmonization of this passage with modern cosmological theory. The fit is so tight, and the sequence of events in the passage is so scientifically correct, that I think you’ll be very interested to see it yourselves sometime. Here’s the link:

    https://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Origin-Earth-Perry-Phillips-ebook/dp/B008JIL7HK/ref=sr_1_2?crid=3USA4IP7A4H9T&keywords=genesis+one+and+the+origin+of+the+earth&qid=1561004671&s=gateway&sprefix=Genesis+One+and+the+%2Caps%2C138&sr=8-2

    • Jonathan Overstreet

      I will preface that I have much sympathy for those who learn science from public education, universities, and popular outlets, since whole fields of science that publish in main stream journals, are totally ignored, even up to the PhD level, and but for the grace of God I would not know of it myself. So I pray that God enables this post to be in love and not just argument.

      One problem with modern cosmological theory, as is popularly taught in universities, is that is mostly ignores a large amount of research and discoveries in 3 major fields of physics that developed and have been publishing in the same journals since Max Plank’s second paper on black body radiation… that was over 100 years ago.

      The best source to update the science would be Barry Setterfield’s monograph, published and peer-reviewed in Natural Philosophy Alliance in 2014, Cosmology and the Zero Point Energy. A lay friendly alternative would be his website, setterfield.org, where a HUGE amount of resources made available to a high school level exists include a lot of discussion questions from high school to peer review criticism exists. Also his youtube videos are excellent.

      Basically, if you set aside the Bible, and just look at the best cosmological science; specifically what develops from actual testable and experimentally reproducible stuff like what happens when you make a miniature solar system in a lab (YES in a LAB!! its awesome we can do this!!) you get a creation order that matches Gen 1 in it’s oddities and even down to the number of hours of a literal 5 day creation (creating humans and resting are not part of astrophysics).

      It gets even better, in June 2018 in Nature, a publication confirmed that all matter in the universe within the first 12 hours post “big bang” started off as a water plasma which then formed the rest of the elements prior to stars forming. Barry has a youtube video just to discuss this work.

  7. Garth and Mary Smiechowski

    Thank you for this excellent study filled with deep insights and accurate exegesis of related scripture and ancient world views. Refreshing water of the word and savory meat to chew on.
    Felt like we were in your living room. Thank you for sharing the Gilbert House.

  8. Jonathan Overstreet

    Hi, I have a question I wish I could ask Dr. Heiser regarding this section that I think you may know enough of his work and scholarly work to at least see if an answer MAY be possible.

    I agree with Dr. Heiser about what he says about paranormal methods of inspiration, and I do agree that there are large Mesopotamian hooks in this sections and other ancient theological concerns. I know it wasn’t meant to teach science. The thing is that based on some really good peer review physics publications, it doesn’t get the science wrong, so how do we process that?

    On Barry Setterfield’s website, setterfield.org, there is a short discussion of what is called the tablet hypothesis. In short, the idea is Gen 1-12 has structure that seems to follow ancient autobiography with the autobiographer signing off with “these are the generations of…” at the end of the writing. If this is true, you suddenly see how all the events in Gen 1-12 happen in the lifetime of whoever signs off the section. This may explain the science accuracy without being about science, since an eye witness can accurately tell what he sees without having to explain how it happened or why, plus if you will note, Gen .1 is signed off by God himself.

    • Clearly, I need to read more of Barry’s stuff. Only so many hours in the day!

      • Jonathan Overstreet

        I would suggest, for maximum efficacy, start off taking 2 hours to watch 2 Youtube videos by Setterfield. 1: Bible and Geology, and 2: earth catastrophes and the time of Job.

        The first because it yields the largest paradigm payout for those thinking about the bible and ancient times, and 2… well I need to see it as of now but based on what he has written on Job so far.. you will really get a lot out of it to use when you get to Job in the Gilbert House Fellowship.

        If you somehow by the grace of God have more time, look up the Dodwell paper’s on his website. They cover a lot of interesting phenomena usually assumed to be fake in the bible that has been proven by Geology.

  9. Jonathan Overstreet

    This is the first post on a new round of awesome GHS… so I just want to say something in general.

    In my church I constantly try to push new couples to come absorb the GHS, because I see a huge value if they do in just being part of an example of godly marriage, with the 2 interacting together in fellowship with scripture, because I just cannot think of anything more valuable for a new couple than doing what you two do here.

    And yeah… I hope they get the content as a side note, and leap forward from there.

  10. Rebecca

    Thank you for doing this bible study. I love digging into the word, so I’ve really been enjoying this.
    I found you guys through YouTube and also enjoy your SkyWatchTV program on there.

  11. Juliana Starling

    Amazing! I just felt the Holy Spirit confirming in my heart that’s the kind of nourishment he has for me. I’ve been starving for in depth study of the word of God. Thank you so much for putting this out there and may God bless you two richly

  12. Kelly & Peter Lynch

    Thank you so much for your ministry. I listen to all that you do Derek & Sharon God bless from Kelly & Peter Lynch.
    Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

  13. Jamie Schultz

    I appreciate your willingness to share your revelations from Jesus. I enjoy the way you present it as well. I am curious about evening and morning. From Day One on, each description ends in evening and then morning – without sun and moon, this cannot be the evening and morning we currently understand. Do you have any insight?
    Thank you for your insight and may God continue to bless us all with this wisdom.

Leave a Reply to Kelly & Peter Lynch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.